|
 |
Cost Comparisons of
Sewer Pipes |
|
|
|
|
|
The highest overall cost is assumed as 100 units |
|
|
|
|
Description |
Percent |
Corrugated HDPE Pipes |
PVC Spiral Wound Pipes |
Reinforced Concrete Pipes |
GRP Polyster Pipes |
Asbestos Cement Pipes |
Ductile Iron Pipes |
Steel Pipes |
|
Material cost |
25% |
20 |
16 |
12 |
18 |
14 |
25 |
22 |
|
Installation cost |
45% |
25 |
32 |
45 |
38 |
40 |
35 |
35 |
|
Maintenance cost |
17% |
6 |
8 |
17 |
12 |
15 |
10 |
10 |
|
Trasportation |
10% |
8 |
8 |
10 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Site waste |
3% |
1 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
|
Total Cost |
100% |
60 |
66 |
87 |
79 |
82 |
81 |
78 |
|
Service Life |
|
50 |
25 |
15 |
25 |
15 |
25 |
20 |
|
Annual cost |
|
1.2 |
1.32 |
1.74 |
1.58 |
1.64 |
1.62 |
1.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specification Comparison
of Sewer Piping |
|
|
|
Description |
Corrugated
HDPE Pipes |
PVC Spiral
Wound Pipes |
Reinforced
Concrete Pipes |
GRP
Polyster Pipes |
Asbestos
Cement Pipes |
Ductile
Iron Pipes |
Steel
Pipes |
|
Chemical resistance |
Excellent |
Average |
Poor |
Average |
Poor |
Poor |
Poor |
|
Tightness/joint quality |
Excellent |
Average |
Poor |
Average |
Poor |
Average |
Average |
|
Soil movement strength |
Excellent |
Poor |
Poor |
Poor |
Poor |
Poor |
Poor |
|
Service maintenance |
Too Low |
Low |
High |
Average |
High |
Average |
Average |
|
Service life |
Excellent |
Average |
Low |
Average |
Low |
Average |
Average |
|
Abrasion |
Excellent |
Average |
Poor |
Poor |
Poor |
Good |
Good |
|
Installation |
Fast |
Fast |
Slow |
Slow |
Slow |
Average |
Slow |
|
Site Waste |
Low |
Average |
High |
Average |
High |
Average |
Average |
|
Smoothness |
Excellent |
Excellent |
Poor |
Average |
Average |
Average |
Average |
|
Impact Strength |
Excellent |
Poor |
Poor |
Poor |
Poor |
Poor |
Poor |
|
Flexibility |
Excellent |
Poor |
Poor |
Poor |
Poor |
Poor |
Poor |
|
Tensile strength |
Average |
Good |
Poor |
Poor |
Poor |
Excellent |
Excellent |
|
|
|
|
|